![]() ![]() Sica, a use variance for a trauma rehabilitation center. The Board of Adjustment of the Township of Wall (the Board) denied the applicant, Dr. This appeal raises the question whether the enhanced standard also applies to inherently beneficial uses. 1, 21, 526 A.2d 109 (1987), we held that an applicant seeking a use variance for a commercial purpose must establish by enhanced proof that the variance is not inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the master plan and zoning ordinance. ![]() The opinion of the Court was delivered by POLLOCK, J. Meiser submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae, Volunteers of America (Frizell, Pozycki & Meiser, attorneys). Hirsch argued the cause for respondent (Crawford & Hirsch, attorneys). Byrnes, attorneys), of counsel Douglas K. Wolfson and Wilentz, Goldman & Spitzer (Messrs. Greenberg argued the cause for appellant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin & Davis, attorneys, Douglas K. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WALL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND TOWNSHIP OF WALL, MONMOUTH COUNTY, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY TOWNSHIP COMMITTEE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WALL AND PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWNSHIP OF WALL, DEFENDANTS. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |